Committing work to S3 with the “S3A Committers”

This page covers the S3A Committers, which can commit work directly to an S3 object store.

These committers are designed to solve a fundamental problem which the standard committers of work cannot do to S3: consistent, high performance, and reliable commitment of output to S3.

For details on their internal design, see S3A Committers: Architecture and Implementation.

January 2021 Update

Now that S3 is fully consistent, problems related to inconsistent directory listings have gone. However the rename problem exists: committing work by renaming directories is unsafe as well as horribly slow.

This architecture document, and the committers, were written at a time when S3 was inconsistent. The two committers addressed this problem differently

  • Staging Committer: rely on a cluster HDFS filesystem for safely propagating the lists of files to commit from workers to the job manager/driver.
  • Magic Committer: require S3Guard to offer consistent directory listings on the object store.

With consistent S3, the Magic Committer can be safely used with any S3 bucket. The choice of which to use, then, is matter for experimentation.

This document was written in 2017, a time when S3 was only consistent when an extra consistency layer such as S3Guard was used. The document indicates where requirements/constraints which existed then are now obsolete.

Introduction: The Commit Problem

Apache Hadoop MapReduce (and behind the scenes, Apache Spark) often write the output of their work to filesystems

Normally, Hadoop uses the FileOutputFormatCommitter to manage the promotion of files created in a single task attempt to the final output of a query. This is done in a way to handle failures of tasks and jobs, and to support speculative execution. It does that by listing directories and renaming their content into the final destination when tasks and then jobs are committed.

This has some key requirement of the underlying filesystem:

  1. When you list a directory, you see all the files which have been created in it, and no files which are not in it (i.e. have been deleted).
  2. When you rename a directory, it is an O(1) atomic transaction. No other process across the cluster may rename a file or directory to the same path. If the rename fails for any reason, either the data is at the original location, or it is at the destination, -in which case the rename actually succeeded.

*The S3 object store and the s3a:// filesystem client cannot meet these requirements.

Although S3A is (now) consistent, the S3A client still mimics rename() by copying files and then deleting the originals. This can fail partway through, and there is nothing to prevent any other process in the cluster attempting a rename at the same time.

As a result,

  • If a rename fails, the data is left in an unknown state.
  • If more than one process attempts to commit work simultaneously, the output directory may contain the results of both processes: it is no longer an exclusive operation. *. Commit time is still proportional to the amount of data created. It still can’t handle task failure.

Using the “classic” FileOutputCommmitter to commit work to Amazon S3 risks loss or corruption of generated data

To address these problems there is now explicit support in the hadop-aws module for committing work to Amazon S3 via the S3A filesystem client, the S3A Committers

For safe, as well as high-performance output of work to S3, we need use “a committer” explicitly written to work with S3, treating it as an object store with special features.

Background : Hadoop’s “Commit Protocol”

How exactly is work written to its final destination? That is accomplished by a “commit protocol” between the workers and the job manager.

This protocol is implemented in Hadoop MapReduce, with a similar but extended version in Apache Spark:

  1. A “Job” is the entire query, with inputs to outputs
  2. The “Job Manager” is the process in charge of choreographing the execution of the job. It may perform some of the actual computation too.
  3. The job has “workers”, which are processes which work the actual data and write the results.
  4. Workers execute “Tasks”, which are fractions of the job, a job whose input has been partitioned into units of work which can be executed independently.
  5. The Job Manager directs workers to execute “tasks”, usually trying to schedule the work close to the data (if the filesystem provides locality information).
  6. Workers can fail: the Job manager needs to detect this and reschedule their active tasks.
  7. Workers can also become separated from the Job Manager, a “network partition”. It is (provably) impossible for the Job Manager to distinguish a running-but-unreachable worker from a failed one.
  8. The output of a failed task must not be visible; this is to avoid its data getting into the final output.
  9. Multiple workers can be instructed to evaluate the same partition of the work; this “speculation” delivers speedup as it can address the “straggler problem”. When multiple workers are working on the same data, only one worker is allowed to write the final output.
  10. The entire job may fail (often from the failure of the Job Manager (MR Master, Spark Driver, …)). 1, The network may partition, with workers isolated from each other or the process managing the entire commit.
  11. Restarted jobs may recover from a failure by reusing the output of all completed tasks (MapReduce with the “v1” algorithm), or just by rerunning everything (The “v2” algorithm and Spark).

What is “the commit protocol” then? It is the requirements on workers as to when their data is made visible, where, for a filesystem, “visible” means “can be seen in the destination directory of the query.”

  • There is a destination directory of work, “the output directory.”
  • The final output of tasks must be in this directory or paths underneath it.
  • The intermediate output of a task must not be visible in the destination directory. That is: they must not write directly to the destination.
  • The final output of a task may be visible under the destination.
  • The Job Manager makes the decision as to whether a task’s data is to be “committed”, be it directly to the final directory or to some intermediate store..
  • Individual workers communicate with the Job manager to manage the commit process: whether the output is to be committed or aborted
  • When a worker commits the output of a task, it somehow promotes its intermediate work to becoming final.
  • When a worker aborts a task’s output, that output must not become visible (i.e. it is not committed).
  • Jobs themselves may be committed/aborted (the nature of “when” is not covered here).
  • After a Job is committed, all its work must be visible.
  • And a file _SUCCESS may be written to the output directory.
  • After a Job is aborted, all its intermediate data is lost.
  • Jobs may also fail. When restarted, the successor job must be able to clean up all the intermediate and committed work of its predecessor(s).
  • Task and Job processes measure the intervals between communications with their Application Master and YARN respectively. When the interval has grown too large they must conclude that the network has partitioned and that they must abort their work.

That’s “essentially” it. When working with HDFS and similar filesystems, directory rename() is the mechanism used to commit the work of tasks and jobs. * Tasks write data to task attempt directories under the directory _temporary underneath the final destination directory. * When a task is committed, these files are renamed to the destination directory (v2 algorithm) or a job attempt directory under _temporary (v1 algorithm). * When a job is committed, for the v2 algorithm the _SUCCESS file is created, and the _temporary deleted. * For the v1 algorithm, when a job is committed, all the tasks committed under the job attempt directory will have their output renamed into the destination directory. * The v2 algorithm recovers from failure by deleting the destination directory and restarting the job. * The v1 algorithm recovers from failure by discovering all committed tasks whose output is in the job attempt directory, and only rerunning all uncommitted tasks.

This algorithm does not works safely or swiftly with AWS S3 storage because tenames go from being fast, atomic operations to slow operations which can fail partway through.

This then is the problem which the S3A committers address:

How to safely and reliably commit work to Amazon S3 or compatible object store

Meet the S3A Committers

Since Hadoop 3.1, the S3A FileSystem has been accompanied by classes designed to integrate with the Hadoop and Spark job commit protocols, classes which interact with the S3A filesystem to reliably commit work work to S3: The S3A Committers

The underlying architecture of this process is very complex, and covered in the committer architecture documentation.

The key concept to know of is S3’s “Multipart Upload” mechanism. This allows an S3 client to write data to S3 in multiple HTTP POST requests, only completing the write operation with a final POST to complete the upload; this final POST consisting of a short list of the etags of the uploaded blocks. This multipart upload mechanism is already automatically used when writing large amounts of data to S3; an implementation detail of the S3A output stream.

The S3A committers make explicit use of this multipart upload (“MPU”) mechanism:

  1. The individual tasks in a job write their data to S3 as POST operations within multipart uploads, yet do not issue the final POST to complete the upload.
  2. The multipart uploads are committed in the job commit process.

There are two different S3A committer types, staging and magic. The committers primarily vary in how data is written during task execution, how the pending commit information is passed to the job manager, and in how conflict with existing files is resolved.

feature staging magic
task output destination local disk S3A without completing the write
task commit process upload data from disk to S3 list all pending uploads on s3 and write details to job attempt directory
task abort process delete local disk data list all pending uploads and abort them
job commit list & complete pending uploads list & complete pending uploads

The other metric is “maturity”. There, the fact that the Staging committers are based on Netflix’s production code counts in its favor.

The Staging Committer

This is based on work from Netflix. It “stages” data into the local filesystem. It also requires the cluster to have HDFS, so that

Tasks write to URLs with file:// schemas. When a task is committed, its files are listed, uploaded to S3 as incompleted Multipart Uploads. The information needed to complete the uploads is saved to HDFS where it is committed through the standard “v1” commit algorithm.

When the Job is committed, the Job Manager reads the lists of pending writes from its HDFS Job destination directory and completes those uploads.

Canceling a task is straightforward: the local directory is deleted with its staged data. Canceling a job is achieved by reading in the lists of pending writes from the HDFS job attempt directory, and aborting those uploads. For extra safety, all outstanding multipart writes to the destination directory are aborted.

The staging committer comes in two slightly different forms, with slightly different conflict resolution policies:

  • Directory: the entire directory tree of data is written or overwritten, as normal.

  • Partitioned: special handling of partitioned directory trees of the form YEAR=2017/MONTH=09/DAY=19: conflict resolution is limited to the partitions being updated.

The Partitioned Committer is intended to allow jobs updating a partitioned directory tree to restrict the conflict resolution to only those partition directories containing new data. It is intended for use with Apache Spark only.

Conflict Resolution in the Staging Committers

The Staging committers offer the ability to replace the conflict policy of the execution engine with policy designed to work with the tree of data. This is based on the experience and needs of Netflix, where efficiently adding new data to an existing partitioned directory tree is a common operation.

<property>
  <name>fs.s3a.committer.staging.conflict-mode</name>
  <value>fail</value>
  <description>
    Staging committer conflict resolution policy: {@value}.
    Supported: fail, append, replace.
  </description>
</property>

replace : when the job is committed (and not before), delete files in directories into which new data will be written.

fail: when there are existing files in the destination, fail the job.

append: Add new data to the directories at the destination; overwriting any with the same name. Reliable use requires unique names for generated files, which the committers generate by default.

The difference between the two staging committers are as follows:

The Directory Committer uses the entire directory tree for conflict resolution. If any file exists at the destination it will fail in job setup; if the resolution mechanism is “replace” then all existing files will be deleted.

The partitioned committer calculates the partitions into which files are added, the final directories in the tree, and uses that in its conflict resolution process:

replace : delete all data in the destination partition before committing the new files.

fail: fail if there is data in the destination partition, ignoring the state of any parallel partitions.

append: add the new data.

It’s intended for use in Apache Spark Dataset operations, rather than Hadoop’s original MapReduce engine, and only in jobs where adding new data to an existing dataset is the desired goal.

Prerequisites for successful work

  1. The output is written into partitions via PARTITIONED BY or partitionedBy() instructions.
  2. There is no data written directly to the root path (all files there are ignored; it’s implicitly “append”).

Here’s an example in Spark, assuming that sourceDataset is a dataset whose columns include “year” and “month”:

sourceDataset
  .write
  .partitionBy("year", "month")
  .mode(SaveMode.Append)
  .opt("fs.s3a.committer.name", "partitioned")
  .opt("fs.s3a.committer.staging.conflict-mode", "replace")
  .format("orc")
  .save("s3a://examples/statistics")

The Magic Committer

The “Magic” committer does its work through “magic” in the filesystem: attempts to write to specific “magic” paths are interpreted as writes to a parent directory which are not to be completed. When the output stream is closed, the information needed to complete the write is saved in the magic directory. The task committer saves the list of these to a directory for the job committers use, or, if aborting, lists the pending writes and aborts them.

The job committer reads in the list of pending commits, and commits them as the Staging Committer does.

Compared to the Staging Committer, the Magic Committer offers faster write times: output is uploaded to S3 as it is written, rather than in the task commit.

However, it has extra requirements of the filesystem

  1. [Obsolete] It requires a consistent object store.
  2. The S3A client must be configured to recognize interactions with the magic directories and treat them specially.

Now that Amazon S3 is consistent, the magic committer is enabled by default.

It’s also not been field tested to the extent of Netflix’s committer; consider it the least mature of the committers.

Which Committer to Use?

  1. If you want to create or update existing partitioned data trees in Spark, use thee Partitioned Committer. Make sure you have enough hard disk capacity for all staged data. Do not use it in other situations.

  2. If you do not have a shared cluster store: use the Magic Committer.

  3. If you are writing large amounts of data: use the Magic Committer.

  4. Otherwise: use the directory committer, making sure you have enough hard disk capacity for all staged data.

Now that S3 is consistent, there are fewer reasons not to use the Magic Committer. Experiment with both to see which works best for your work.

Switching to an S3A Committer

To use an S3A committer, the property mapreduce.outputcommitter.factory.scheme.s3a must be set to the S3A committer factory, org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.commit.staging.S3ACommitterFactory. This is done in mapred-default.xml

<property>
  <name>mapreduce.outputcommitter.factory.scheme.s3a</name>
  <value>org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.commit.S3ACommitterFactory</value>
  <description>
    The committer factory to use when writing data to S3A filesystems.
  </description>
</property>

What is missing is an explicit choice of committer to use in the property fs.s3a.committer.name; so the classic (and unsafe) file committer is used.

fs.s3a.committer.name Committer
directory directory staging committer
partitioned partition staging committer (for use in Spark only)
magic the “magic” committer
file the original and unsafe File committer; (default)

Using the Directory and Partitioned Staging Committers

Generated files are initially written to a local directory underneath one of the temporary directories listed in fs.s3a.buffer.dir.

The staging committer needs a path in the cluster filesystem (e.g. HDFS). This must be declared in fs.s3a.committer.staging.tmp.path.

Temporary files are saved in HDFS (or other cluster filesystem) under the path ${fs.s3a.committer.staging.tmp.path}/${user} where user is the name of the user running the job. The default value of fs.s3a.committer.staging.tmp.path is tmp/staging, Which will be converted at run time to a path under the current user’s home directory, essentially ~/tmp/staging so the temporary directory

The application attempt ID is used to create a unique path under this directory, resulting in a path ~/tmp/staging/${user}/${application-attempt-id}/ under which summary data of each task’s pending commits are managed using the standard FileOutputFormat committer.

When a task is committed the data is uploaded under the destination directory. The policy of how to react if the destination exists is defined by the fs.s3a.committer.staging.conflict-mode setting.

fs.s3a.committer.staging.conflict-mode Meaning
fail Fail if the destination directory exists
replace Delete all existing files before committing the new data
append Add the new files to the existing directory tree

The “Partitioned” Staging Committer

This committer an extension of the “Directory” committer which has a special conflict resolution policy designed to support operations which insert new data into a directory tree structured using Hive’s partitioning strategy: different levels of the tree represent different columns.

For example, log data could be partitioned by YEAR and then by MONTH, with different entries underneath.

logs/YEAR=2017/MONTH=01/
  log-20170101.avro
  log-20170102.avro
  ...
  log-20170131.avro

logs/YEAR=2017/MONTH=02/
  log-20170201.avro
  log-20170202.avro
  ...
  log-20170227.avro

logs/YEAR=2017/MONTH=03/
logs/YEAR=2017/MONTH=04/

A partitioned structure like this allows for queries using Hive or Spark to filter out files which do not contain relevant data.

What the partitioned committer does is, where the tooling permits, allows callers to add data to an existing partitioned layout*.

More specifically, it does this by having a conflict resolution options which only act on individual partitions, rather than across the entire output tree.

fs.s3a.committer.staging.conflict-mode Meaning
fail Fail if the destination partition(s) exist
replace Delete the existing data partitions before committing the new data
append Add the new data to the existing partitions

As an example, if a job was writing the file logs/YEAR=2017/MONTH=02/log-20170228.avro, then with a policy of fail, the job would fail. With a policy of replace, then entire directory logs/YEAR=2017/MONTH=02/ would be deleted before the new file log-20170228.avro was written. With the policy of append, the new file would be added to the existing set of files.

Notes

  1. A deep partition tree can itself be a performance problem in S3 and the s3a client, or, more specifically. a problem with applications which use recursive directory tree walks to work with data.

  2. The outcome if you have more than one job trying simultaneously to write data to the same destination with any policy other than “append” is undefined.

  3. In the append operation, there is no check for conflict with file names. If, in the example above, the file log-20170228.avro already existed, it would be overridden. Set fs.s3a.committer.staging.unique-filenames to true to ensure that a UUID is included in every filename to avoid this.

Using the Magic committer

This is less mature than the Staging Committer, but promises higher performance.

FileSystem client setup

  1. Turn the magic on by fs.s3a.committer.magic.enabled"
<property>
  <name>fs.s3a.committer.magic.enabled</name>
  <description>
  Enable support in the filesystem for the S3 "Magic" committer.
  </description>
  <value>true</value>
</property>

Enabling the committer

<property>
  <name>fs.s3a.committer.name</name>
  <value>magic</value>
</property>

Conflict management is left to the execution engine itself.

Common Committer Options

Option Meaning Default
mapreduce.fileoutputcommitter.marksuccessfuljobs Write a _SUCCESS file on the successful completion of the job. true
fs.s3a.buffer.dir Local filesystem directory for data being written and/or staged. ${hadoop.tmp.dir}/s3a
fs.s3a.committer.magic.enabled Enable “magic committer” support in the filesystem. false
fs.s3a.committer.abort.pending.uploads list and abort all pending uploads under the destination path when the job is committed or aborted. true
fs.s3a.committer.threads Number of threads in committers for parallel operations on files. 8
fs.s3a.committer.generate.uuid Generate a Job UUID if none is passed down from Spark false
fs.s3a.committer.require.uuid Require the Job UUID to be passed down from Spark false

Staging committer (Directory and Partitioned) options

Option Meaning Default
fs.s3a.committer.staging.conflict-mode Conflict resolution: fail, append or replace append
fs.s3a.committer.staging.tmp.path Path in the cluster filesystem for temporary data. tmp/staging
fs.s3a.committer.staging.unique-filenames Generate unique filenames. true
fs.s3a.committer.staging.abort.pending.uploads Deprecated; replaced by fs.s3a.committer.abort.pending.uploads. (false)

Common Committer Options

<property>
  <name>fs.s3a.committer.name</name>
  <value>file</value>
  <description>
    Committer to create for output to S3A, one of:
    "file", "directory", "partitioned", "magic".
  </description>
</property>

<property>
  <name>fs.s3a.committer.magic.enabled</name>
  <value>true</value>
  <description>
    Enable support in the filesystem for the S3 "Magic" committer.
  </description>
</property>

<property>
  <name>fs.s3a.committer.threads</name>
  <value>8</value>
  <description>
    Number of threads in committers for parallel operations on files
    (upload, commit, abort, delete...)
  </description>
</property>

<property>
  <name>fs.s3a.committer.abort.pending.uploads</name>
  <value>true</value>
  <description>
    Should the committers abort all pending uploads to the destination
    directory?

    Set to false if more than one job is writing to the same directory tree.
    Was:  "fs.s3a.committer.staging.abort.pending.uploads" when only used
    by the staging committers.
  </description>
</property>

<property>
  <name>mapreduce.outputcommitter.factory.scheme.s3a</name>
  <value>org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.commit.S3ACommitterFactory</value>
  <description>
    The committer factory to use when writing data to S3A filesystems.
    If mapreduce.outputcommitter.factory.class is set, it will
    override this property.

    (This property is set in mapred-default.xml)
  </description>
</property>

<property>
  <name>fs.s3a.committer.require.uuid</name>
  <value>false</value>
  <description>
    Should the committer fail to initialize if a unique ID isn't set in
    "spark.sql.sources.writeJobUUID" or fs.s3a.committer.staging.uuid
    This helps guarantee that unique IDs for jobs are being
    passed down in spark applications.
  
    Setting this option outside of spark will stop the S3A committer
    in job setup. In MapReduce workloads the job attempt ID is unique
    and so no unique ID need be passed down.
  </description>
</property>

<property>
  <name>fs.s3a.committer.generate.uuid</name>
  <value>false</value>
  <description>
    Generate a Job UUID if none is passed down from Spark.
    This uuid is only generated if the fs.s3a.committer.require.uuid flag
    is false. 
  </description>
</property>

Staging Committer Options

<property>
  <name>fs.s3a.committer.staging.tmp.path</name>
  <value>tmp/staging</value>
  <description>
    Path in the cluster filesystem for temporary data.
    This is for HDFS, not the local filesystem.
    It is only for the summary data of each file, not the actual
    data being committed.
    Using an unqualified path guarantees that the full path will be
    generated relative to the home directory of the user creating the job,
    hence private (assuming home directory permissions are secure).
  </description>
</property>

<property>
  <name>fs.s3a.committer.staging.unique-filenames</name>
  <value>true</value>
  <description>
    Option for final files to have a unique name through job attempt info,
    or the value of fs.s3a.committer.staging.uuid
    When writing data with the "append" conflict option, this guarantees
    that new data will not overwrite any existing data.
  </description>
</property>

<property>
  <name>fs.s3a.committer.staging.conflict-mode</name>
  <value>append</value>
  <description>
    Staging committer conflict resolution policy.
    Supported: "fail", "append", "replace".
  </description>
</property>


Disabling magic committer path rewriting

The magic committer recognizes when files are created under paths with __magic/ as a parent directory and redirects the upload to a different location, adding the information needed to complete the upload in the job commit operation.

If, for some reason, you do not want these paths to be redirected and not manifest until later, the feature can be disabled by setting fs.s3a.committer.magic.enabled to false.

By default it is true.

<property>
  <name>fs.s3a.committer.magic.enabled</name>
  <value>true</value>
  <description>
    Enable support in the S3A filesystem for the "Magic" committer.
  </description>
</property>

Concurrent Jobs writing to the same destination

It is sometimes possible for multiple jobs to simultaneously write to the same destination path.

Before attempting this, the committers must be set to not delete all incomplete uploads on job commit, by setting fs.s3a.committer.abort.pending.uploads to false

<property>
  <name>fs.s3a.committer.abort.pending.uploads</name>
  <value>false</value>
</property>

If more than one job is writing to the same destination path then every task MUST be creating files with paths/filenames unique to the specific job. It is not enough for them to be unique by task part-00000.snappy.parquet, because each job will have tasks with the same name, so generate files with conflicting operations.

For the staging committers, setting fs.s3a.committer.staging.unique-filenames to ensure unique names are generated during the upload. Otherwise, use what configuration options are available in the specific FileOutputFormat.

Note: by default, the option mapreduce.output.basename sets the base name for files; changing that from the default part value to something unique for each job may achieve this.

For example, for any job executed through Hadoop MapReduce, the Job ID can be used in the filename.

<property>
  <name>mapreduce.output.basename</name>
  <value>part-${mapreduce.job.id}</value>
</property>

Even with these settings, the outcome of concurrent jobs to the same destination is inherently nondeterministic -use with caution.

Troubleshooting

Filesystem does not have support for 'magic' committer

org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.commit.PathCommitException: `s3a://landsat-pds': Filesystem does not have support for 'magic' committer enabled
in configuration option fs.s3a.committer.magic.enabled

The Job is configured to use the magic committer, but the S3A bucket has not been explicitly declared as supporting it.

This can be done for those buckets which are known to be consistent, either because S3Guard is used to provide consistency, or because the S3-compatible filesystem is known to be strongly consistent.

<property>
  <name>fs.s3a.bucket.landsat-pds.committer.magic.enabled</name>
  <value>true</value>
</property>

Tip: you can verify that a bucket supports the magic committer through the hadoop s3guard bucket-info command:

> hadoop s3guard bucket-info -magic s3a://landsat-pds/

Filesystem s3a://landsat-pds
Location: us-west-2
Filesystem s3a://landsat-pds is not using S3Guard
The "magic" committer is not supported

S3A Client
  Signing Algorithm: fs.s3a.signing-algorithm=(unset)
  Endpoint: fs.s3a.endpoint=s3.amazonaws.com
  Encryption: fs.s3a.server-side-encryption-algorithm=none
  Input seek policy: fs.s3a.experimental.input.fadvise=normal
  Change Detection Source: fs.s3a.change.detection.source=etag
  Change Detection Mode: fs.s3a.change.detection.mode=server
Delegation token support is disabled
2019-05-17 13:53:38,245 [main] INFO  util.ExitUtil (ExitUtil.java:terminate(210)) -
 Exiting with status 46: 46: The magic committer is not enabled for s3a://landsat-pds

Error message: “File being created has a magic path, but the filesystem has magic file support disabled”

A file is being written to a path which is used for “magic” files, files which are actually written to a different destination than their stated path but the filesystem doesn’t support “magic” files

This message should not appear through the committer itself —it will fail with the error message in the previous section, but may arise if other applications are attempting to create files under the path /__magic/.

Make sure the filesystem meets the requirements of the magic committer (a consistent S3A filesystem through S3Guard or the S3 service itself), and set the fs.s3a.committer.magic.enabled flag to indicate that magic file writes are supported.

FileOutputCommitter appears to be still used (from logs or delays in commits)

The Staging committers use the original FileOutputCommitter to manage the propagation of commit information: do not worry if it the logs show FileOutputCommitter work with data in the cluster filesystem (e.g. HDFS).

One way to make sure that the FileOutputCommitter is not being used to write the data to S3 is to set the option mapreduce.fileoutputcommitter.algorithm.version to a value such as “10”. Because the only supported algorithms are “1” and “2”, any erroneously created FileOutputCommitter will raise an exception in its constructor when instantiated:

java.io.IOException: Only 1 or 2 algorithm version is supported
at org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.lib.output.FileOutputCommitter.<init>(FileOutputCommitter.java:130)
at org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.lib.output.FileOutputCommitter.<init>(FileOutputCommitter.java:104)
at org.apache.parquet.hadoop.ParquetOutputCommitter.<init>(ParquetOutputCommitter.java:42)
at org.apache.parquet.hadoop.ParquetOutputFormat.getOutputCommitter(ParquetOutputFormat.java:395)
at org.apache.spark.internal.io.HadoopMapReduceCommitProtocol.setupCommitter(HadoopMapReduceCommitProtocol.scala:67)
at com.hortonworks.spark.cloud.commit.PathOutputCommitProtocol.setupCommitter(PathOutputCommitProtocol.scala:62)
at org.apache.spark.internal.io.HadoopMapReduceCommitProtocol.setupJob(HadoopMapReduceCommitProtocol.scala:124)
at com.hortonworks.spark.cloud.commit.PathOutputCommitProtocol.setupJob(PathOutputCommitProtocol.scala:152)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.FileFormatWriter$.write(FileFormatWriter.scala:175)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.InsertIntoHadoopFsRelationCommand.run(InsertIntoHadoopFsRelationCommand.scala:145)

While that will not make the problem go away, it will at least make the failure happen at the start of a job.

(Setting this option will not interfere with the Staging Committers’ use of HDFS, as it explicitly sets the algorithm to “2” for that part of its work).

The other way to check which committer to use is to examine the _SUCCESS file. If it is 0-bytes long, the classic FileOutputCommitter committed the job. The S3A committers all write a non-empty JSON file; the committer field lists the committer used.

Common causes

  1. The property fs.s3a.committer.name is set to “file”. Fix: change.
  2. The job has overridden the property mapreduce.outputcommitter.factory.class with a new factory class for all committers. This takes priority over all committers registered for the s3a:// schema.
  3. The property mapreduce.outputcommitter.factory.scheme.s3a is unset.
  4. The output format has overridden FileOutputFormat.getOutputCommitter() and is returning its own committer -one which is a subclass of FileOutputCommitter.

That final cause. the output format is returning its own committer, is not easily fixed; it may be that the custom committer performs critical work during its lifecycle, and contains assumptions about the state of the written data during task and job commit (i.e. it is in the destination filesystem). Consult with the authors/maintainers of the output format to see whether it would be possible to integrate with the new committer factory mechanism and object-store-specific commit algorithms.

Parquet is a special case here: its committer does no extra work other than add the option to read all newly-created files then write a schema summary. The Spark integration has explicit handling for Parquet to enable it to support the new committers, removing this (slow on S3) option.

If you have subclassed FileOutputCommitter and want to move to the factory model, please get in touch.

Job/Task fails with PathExistsException: Destination path exists and committer conflict resolution mode is “fail”

This surfaces when either of two conditions are met.

  1. The Directory committer is used with fs.s3a.committer.staging.conflict-mode set to fail and the output/destination directory exists. The job will fail in the driver during job setup.
  2. The Partitioned Committer is used with fs.s3a.committer.staging.conflict-mode set to fail and one of the partitions exist. The specific task(s) generating conflicting data will fail during task commit, which will cause the entire job to fail.

If you are trying to write data and want write conflicts to be rejected, this is the correct behavior: there was data at the destination so the job was aborted.

Staging committer task fails with IOException: No space left on device

There’s not enough space on the local hard disk (real or virtual) to store all the uncommitted data of the active tasks on that host. Because the staging committers write all output to the local disk and only upload the data on task commits, enough local temporary storage is needed to store all output generated by all uncommitted tasks running on the single host. Small EC2 VMs may run out of disk.

  1. Make sure that fs.s3a.buffer.dir includes a temporary directory on every available hard disk; this spreads load better.

  2. Add more disk space. In EC2: request instances with more local storage. There is no need for EMR storage; this is just for temporary data.

  3. Purge the directories listed in fs.s3a.buffer.dir of old data. Failed tasks may not clean up all old files.

  4. Reduce the number of worker threads/process in the host.

  5. Consider partitioning the job into more tasks. This may result in more tasks generating less data each.

  6. Use the magic committer. This only needs enough disk storage to buffer blocks of the currently being written file during their upload process, so can use a lot less disk space.

Jobs run with directory/partitioned committers complete but the output is empty.

Make sure that fs.s3a.committer.staging.tmp.path is set to a path on the shared cluster filesystem (usually HDFS). It MUST NOT be set to a local directory, as then the job committer, running on a different host will not see the lists of pending uploads to commit.

Magic output committer task fails “The specified upload does not exist” “Error Code: NoSuchUpload”

The magic committer is being used and a task writing data to the S3 store fails with an error message about the upload not existing.

java.io.FileNotFoundException: upload part #1 upload
    YWHTRqBaxlsutujKYS3eZHfdp6INCNXbk0JVtydX_qzL5fZcoznxRbbBZRfswOjomddy3ghRyguOqywJTfGG1Eq6wOW2gitP4fqWrBYMroasAygkmXNYF7XmUyFHYzja
    on test/ITestMagicCommitProtocol-testParallelJobsToSameDestPaths/part-m-00000:
    com.amazonaws.services.s3.model.AmazonS3Exception: The specified upload does not
    exist. The upload ID may be invalid, or the upload may have been aborted or
    completed. (Service: Amazon S3; Status Code: 404; Error Code: NoSuchUpload;
    Request ID: EBE6A0C9F8213AC3; S3 Extended Request ID:
    cQFm2N+666V/1HehZYRPTHX9tFK3ppvHSX2a8Oy3qVDyTpOFlJZQqJpSixMVyMI1D0dZkHHOI+E=),
    S3 Extended Request ID:
    cQFm2N+666V/1HehZYRPTHX9tFK3ppvHSX2a8Oy3qVDyTpOFlJZQqJpSixMVyMI1D0dZkHHOI+E=:NoSuchUpload

    at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.S3AUtils.translateException(S3AUtils.java:259)
    at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.Invoker.once(Invoker.java:112)
    at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.Invoker.lambda$retry$4(Invoker.java:315)
    at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.Invoker.retryUntranslated(Invoker.java:407)
    at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.Invoker.retry(Invoker.java:311)
    at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.Invoker.retry(Invoker.java:286)
    at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.WriteOperationHelper.retry(WriteOperationHelper.java:154)
    at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.WriteOperationHelper.uploadPart(WriteOperationHelper.java:590)
    at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.S3ABlockOutputStream$MultiPartUpload.lambda$uploadBlockAsync$0(S3ABlockOutputStream.java:652)

Caused by: com.amazonaws.services.s3.model.AmazonS3Exception:
    The specified upload does not exist.
    The upload ID may be invalid, or the upload may have been aborted or completed.
    (Service: Amazon S3; Status Code: 404; Error Code: NoSuchUpload; Request ID: EBE6A0C9F8213AC3; S3 Extended Request ID:
    cQFm2N+666V/1HehZYRPTHX9tFK3ppvHSX2a8Oy3qVDyTpOFlJZQqJpSixMVyMI1D0dZkHHOI+E=),
    S3 Extended Request ID: cQFm2N+666V/1HehZYRPTHX9tFK3ppvHSX2a8Oy3qVDyTpOFlJZQqJpSixMVyMI1D0dZkHHOI+E=
    at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient$RequestExecutor.handleErrorResponse(AmazonHttpClient.java:1712)
    at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient$RequestExecutor.executeOneRequest(AmazonHttpClient.java:1367)
    at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient$RequestExecutor.executeHelper(AmazonHttpClient.java:1113)
    at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient$RequestExecutor.doExecute(AmazonHttpClient.java:770)
    at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient$RequestExecutor.executeWithTimer(AmazonHttpClient.java:744)
    at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient$RequestExecutor.execute(AmazonHttpClient.java:726)
    at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient$RequestExecutor.access$500(AmazonHttpClient.java:686)
    at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient$RequestExecutionBuilderImpl.execute(AmazonHttpClient.java:668)
    at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient.execute(AmazonHttpClient.java:532)
    at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient.execute(AmazonHttpClient.java:512)
    at com.amazonaws.services.s3.AmazonS3Client.invoke(AmazonS3Client.java:4920)
    at com.amazonaws.services.s3.AmazonS3Client.invoke(AmazonS3Client.java:4866)
    at com.amazonaws.services.s3.AmazonS3Client.doUploadPart(AmazonS3Client.java:3715)
    at com.amazonaws.services.s3.AmazonS3Client.uploadPart(AmazonS3Client.java:3700)
    at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.S3AFileSystem.uploadPart(S3AFileSystem.java:2343)
    at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.WriteOperationHelper.lambda$uploadPart$8(WriteOperationHelper.java:594)
    at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.Invoker.once(Invoker.java:110)
    ... 15 more

The block write failed because the previously created upload was aborted before the data could be written.

Causes

  1. Another job has written to the same directory tree with an S3A committer -and when that job was committed, all incomplete uploads were aborted.
  2. The hadoop s3guard uploads --abort command has being called on/above the directory.
  3. Some other program is cancelling uploads to that bucket/path under it.
  4. The job is lasting over 24h and a bucket lifecycle policy is aborting the uploads.

The _SUCCESS file from the previous job may provide diagnostics.

If the cause is Concurrent Jobs, see Concurrent Jobs writing to the same destination.

Job commit fails “java.io.FileNotFoundException: Completing multipart upload” “The specified upload does not exist”

The job commit fails with an error about the specified upload not existing.

java.io.FileNotFoundException: Completing multipart upload on
    test/DELAY_LISTING_ME/ITestDirectoryCommitProtocol-testParallelJobsToSameDestPaths/part-m-00001:
    com.amazonaws.services.s3.model.AmazonS3Exception:
    The specified upload does not exist.
    The upload ID may be invalid, or the upload may have been aborted or completed.
    (Service: Amazon S3; Status Code: 404; Error Code: NoSuchUpload;
    Request ID: 8E6173241D2970CB; S3 Extended Request ID:
    Pg6x75Q60UrbSJgfShCFX7czFTZAHR1Cy7W0Kh+o1uj60CG9jw7hL40tSa+wa7BRLbaz3rhX8Ds=),
    S3 Extended Request ID:
    Pg6x75Q60UrbSJgfShCFX7czFTZAHR1Cy7W0Kh+o1uj60CG9jw7hL40tSa+wa7BRLbaz3rhX8Ds=:NoSuchUpload

    at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.S3AUtils.translateException(S3AUtils.java:259)
    at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.Invoker.once(Invoker.java:112)
    at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.Invoker.lambda$retry$4(Invoker.java:315)
    at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.Invoker.retryUntranslated(Invoker.java:407)
    at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.Invoker.retry(Invoker.java:311)
    at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.WriteOperationHelper.finalizeMultipartUpload(WriteOperationHelper.java:261)
    at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.WriteOperationHelper.commitUpload(WriteOperationHelper.java:549)
    at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.commit.CommitOperations.innerCommit(CommitOperations.java:199)
    at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.commit.CommitOperations.commit(CommitOperations.java:168)
    at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.commit.CommitOperations.commitOrFail(CommitOperations.java:144)
    at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.commit.CommitOperations.access$100(CommitOperations.java:74)
    at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.commit.CommitOperations$CommitContext.commitOrFail(CommitOperations.java:612)
    at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.commit.AbstractS3ACommitter.lambda$loadAndCommit$5(AbstractS3ACommitter.java:535)
    at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.commit.Tasks$Builder.runSingleThreaded(Tasks.java:164)
    at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.commit.Tasks$Builder.run(Tasks.java:149)
    at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.commit.AbstractS3ACommitter.loadAndCommit(AbstractS3ACommitter.java:534)
    at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.commit.AbstractS3ACommitter.lambda$commitPendingUploads$2(AbstractS3ACommitter.java:482)
    at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.commit.Tasks$Builder$1.run(Tasks.java:253)

Caused by: com.amazonaws.services.s3.model.AmazonS3Exception: The specified upload does not exist.
    The upload ID may be invalid, or the upload may have been aborted or completed.
    (Service: Amazon S3; Status Code: 404; Error Code: NoSuchUpload; Request ID: 8E6173241D2970CB;
    S3 Extended Request ID: Pg6x75Q60UrbSJgfShCFX7czFTZAHR1Cy7W0Kh+o1uj60CG9jw7hL40tSa+wa7BRLbaz3rhX8Ds=),

    at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient$RequestExecutor.handleErrorResponse(AmazonHttpClient.java:1712)
    at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient$RequestExecutor.executeOneRequest(AmazonHttpClient.java:1367)
    at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient$RequestExecutor.executeHelper(AmazonHttpClient.java:1113)
    at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient$RequestExecutor.doExecute(AmazonHttpClient.java:770)
    at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient$RequestExecutor.executeWithTimer(AmazonHttpClient.java:744)
    at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient$RequestExecutor.execute(AmazonHttpClient.java:726)
    at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient$RequestExecutor.access$500(AmazonHttpClient.java:686)
    at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient$RequestExecutionBuilderImpl.execute(AmazonHttpClient.java:668)
    at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient.execute(AmazonHttpClient.java:532)
    at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient.execute(AmazonHttpClient.java:512)
    at com.amazonaws.services.s3.AmazonS3Client.invoke(AmazonS3Client.java:4920)
    at com.amazonaws.services.s3.AmazonS3Client.invoke(AmazonS3Client.java:4866)
    at com.amazonaws.services.s3.AmazonS3Client.completeMultipartUpload(AmazonS3Client.java:3464)
    at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.WriteOperationHelper.lambda$finalizeMultipartUpload$1(WriteOperationHelper.java:267)
    at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.Invoker.once(Invoker.java:110)

The problem is likely to be that of the previous one: concurrent jobs are writing the same output directory, or another program has cancelled all pending uploads.

See Concurrent Jobs writing to the same destination.

Job commit fails java.io.FileNotFoundException “File hdfs://…/staging-uploads/_temporary/0 does not exist”

The Staging committer will fail in job commit if the intermediate directory on the cluster FS is missing during job commit.

This is possible if another job used the same staging upload directory and, after committing its work, it deleted the directory.

A unique Job ID is required for each spark job run by a specific user. Spark generates job IDs for its committers using the current timestamp, and if two jobs/stages are started in the same second, they will have the same job ID.

See SPARK-33230.

This is fixed in all spark releases which have the patch applied.

You can set the property fs.s3a.committer.staging.require.uuid to fail the staging committers fast if a unique Job ID isn’t found in spark.sql.sources.writeJobUUID.

Job setup fails Job/task context does not contain a unique ID in spark.sql.sources.writeJobUUID

This will surface in job setup if the option fs.s3a.committer.require.uuid is true, and one of the following conditions are met

  1. The committer is being used in a Hadoop MapReduce job, whose job attempt ID is unique -there is no need to add this requirement. Fix: unset fs.s3a.committer.require.uuid.
  2. The committer is being used in spark, and the version of spark being used does not set the spark.sql.sources.writeJobUUID property. Either upgrade to a new spark release, or set fs.s3a.committer.generate.uuid to true.